NYC Detailed Forecast for Saturday, Dec 15, 2018

Saturday looks to be a dreary start to the weekend, however, it appears at this time that it’ll actually end up being the better half of the weekend. While rain chances exist for Saturday, the best conditions for heavier rain don’t look to materialize until Sunday. Even with clouds, rain, and winds shifting onshore from the east and northeast, Saturday afternoon may end up being the warmest day we’ve seen for quite some time. Below, I will provide a detailed forecast using KLGA (LaGuardia Airport) as a reference point. This is because KLGA will be easy to verify forecast outcomes for.

My Forecast
High: 51ºF | Low: 41ºF | Max sustained winds: 17 mph | Total precipitation: 0.13″ – verification for temperatures and precipitation will come from METAR data for the period between 1AM Saturday and 1AM Sunday (06Z Saturday to 06Z Sunday). Wind speed verification will draw on the daily climate summary.

Verification
High: 50ºF | Low: 45ºF | Max sustained winds: 24 mph | Total precipitation: 0.11″. Updated Sunday, December 16, 2018 1PM EST. Assessment: this ended up being a good forecast on precipitation and high temperature. However, I was too low on wind and low temperatures. Because of the light precipitation, little evaporational cooling occurred at the surface, where the air was nearly saturated most of the day, leading to warmer low temperatures. For winds, I may need to adjust my forecasts upwards for LGA when winds are out of the northeast because winds from this direction will flow over the open waters of the East River, with very little frictional drag.

Synoptic Set Up (The Big Picture)

A slow moving storm system with origins in the Deep South will make its way into the Northeast over the weekend. This storm will eventually transition to a coastal storm as it moves offshore of the Northeast. At the 500 mb level, this storm is driven by a closed low, which will almost nearly become completely cut off from the primary wind pattern (steering currents) at this level. This is what explains the slow forward progress of the storm. The result of this is that we’ll experience an extended period of cloudy and rainy weather this weekend. Low-level moisture appears to be maximized on Sunday, though, so Saturday may end up being a better weekend day.

Surface forecast from Weather Prediction Center, valid 7PM Saturday

High Temperature

MOS forecasts show high temperatures Saturday in the low-mid 50s, with NAM (North American Model) coming in at 53ºF and GFS (Global Forecast System) pointing to 56ºF. NBM (National Blend of Models) – a consensus based forecast model, showed highs of only 49ºF. I tend to side with high temperatures on the cooler side due to persistent low overcast clouds (discussed below), and an onshore northeasterly wind later in the day.

Low Temperature

The same MOS data above has lows on Saturday of 44ºF for NAM, 46ºF for GFS and 43ºF for NBM. I’m siding with the cooler side of the forecast envelope again due to the fact that precipitation will be ongoing overnight and there could be some evaporational cooling impacts to account for. Also, with the forecast period ending 06Z Sunday, I actually think the low for this period could be at the tail end, based on MOS. This would be after a prolonged period of onshore winds that I think could bring temperatures into the low-40s.

Max Sustained Winds

Although there will be precipitation during Saturday, as cited below, there looks to be a stable layer with a surface inversion during much of the day on Saturday (see the second Skew-T below). This will make downward momentum transfer during precipitation periods rather inefficient. The pressure gradient isn’t looking particularly strong either, since the low won’t be deepening until Sunday when it moves offshore. With these factors in mind, I think that a max sustained wind of 15 knots (17.25 mph) is reasonable.

Total Precipitation

This will be the trickiest part of the forecast. As is often the case with coastal storms, the gradient of precipitation totals is quite steep. There’s also considerable spread in ensemble models for total precipitation, leading to a low confidence in this forecast. A key factor here is that low-level moisture doesn’t look to be particularly robust as the day progresses (see graphic below). There’s also no clear lifting mechanism at the surface.

850 mb relative humidity, and wind at 1PM Saturday. Areas in blue are saturated, browns indicate very dry air, note how close that dry air is to NYC

While it’s clear that the day starts off with rain overnight, both GFS and NAM suggest that things will dry out a bit in the afternoon hours. That could translate to a lull in precipitation during that time frame.

NAM forecast sounding for 4AM at KLGA. Refer to my earlier post for a guide on how to interpret this Skew-T.
By 1PM, though, not that there’s a marked drying of the low levels above 850 mb. This could certainly cut into precipitation and result in light rain or even a lull in rainfall.

SREF probabilities of total precipitation and the best lift show that these remain south of the area, over the open waters of the Atlantic. However, the gradient is quite sharp for this, so any deviation northward on the storm track could throw a lot more rain our way.

SREF (Short Range Ensemble Forecast) forecast of strong lift (omega >= -9 microbar/sec). Lift is a critical ingredient in producing precipitation. I’ll explain in a later post 🙂


NYC Weekend Weather – Dec 14, 2018

A slow moving storm system will bring a prolonged period of unsettled weather to the NYC region this weekend. The upside of this storm is that it will usher in some warmer air from the south, giving us some above average temperatures for a brief spell. Behind this storm system a cold front is forecast to pass through early next week and return us to below normal cold for this time of year. I will be following up on this post with a detailed forecast for Saturday, as I attempt to keep my forecasting skills sharp.

Rest of today – overcast, with high temperatures around 50ºF. Increasing chances for rain going into this evening and overnight. Low temperatures in the mid-40s overnight.

Surface forecast for Saturday morning, 7AM

Saturday – similar day to today with a generally gloomy feel, overcast skies with a chance for rain, though looks like precipitation will be on the light side. High temperatures in the low-50s. Overnight lows into Sunday cooler than Friday, in the low-40s.

Sunday – yet more rain possible with the storm slowly making its way east and transitioning to a coastal storm. High temperatures are expected to be cooler because winds will shift onshore from the northeast – highs probably in the mid-40s. Overnight into Monday, temperatures should hold in the upper-30s with rain chances winding down.


Surface forecast for Sunday at 7AM

Monday – skies slowly clearing with high temperatures in the mid-40s.

December 10, 2018 Southeastern Snowstorm Post-Mortem

A major news story unfolded over the weekend as the Southeastern US got slammed with a snowstorm that dropped uncommon snow totals over the area, causing widespread travel disruptions. This region of the country is not accustomed to snowstorms of this scale and many municipalities were not prepared for it. Making matters worse, there was a major forecast bust in this storm, which shared key characteristics with a similar forecast bust that led to a high impact snowstorm hitting NYC a few weeks ago on November 15th (and may have prompted the ouster of the director of NYC Office of Emergency Management). For example, Richmond, VA had a forecast going into Sunday for only 1″ of accumulating snow, but in fact received 11.5″ when all was said and done – a near record-breaking storm.

Below, I’ll provide a “post-mortem” analysis of why forecasters missed the mark so badly in this case. The overall lesson here underscores the difficulty of forecasting snow when temperatures are expected to be hovering close to freezing, especially in coastal storms where the precipitation gradient can be quite sharp.

Dry air at the outset of the storm

Soundings from KWAL (Wallops Island NASA Launch Facility, which we can use as a reasonable proxy for areas in Virginia heavily impacted by snow) at the outset of this storm showed very dry air at the low levels of the atmosphere. This is indicated by the large gap between dew points (green line) and the environmental temperature (red line) on the Skew-T diagram below.

Since I think most people reading this are probably not familiar with Skew-Ts, let me provide a brief exposition. These charts are densely packed with data and can be difficult to read. To orient yourself, know that the y axis on these represents pressure levels from the surface (~1000 mb) all the way up to almost the very limit of the atmosphere at 100 mb. Pressure levels are also related to altitude, though this relationship is not linear because it depends on temperature. The x axis on these charts shows temperature in degrees Celsius. However, note that the lines of temperature are actually slanted at a 45 degree angle and not straight up. The dotted blue line to the right marks the 0 degree mark, critical for determining whether precipitation is frozen or not.

So back to the Skew-T at hand – notice that above the 700 mb layer, the dew point (green) and environmental temperature (red) lines were essentially overlapping. This indicates a layer of air that’s reached saturation since by definition, dew point is the temperature to which the air would need to be cooled to be saturated. When you see a thick layer of dew points and temperatures meeting, it generally indicates ongoing precipitation (thinner layers like this can indicate clouds). In this case, what’s happening is that precipitation is falling from about 400 mb down, but from 700 mb and below, the air is very dry.

With this set up in place, we have excellent conditions for evaporational cooling. As precipitation from above starts to saturate the layers below (some of the precipitation evaporates into the dry layer), the temperature actually cools because evaporation is a phase change of water that requires an input of energy (heat). This is exactly the same mechanism that occurs when you exercise and sweat, or when you step out of a shower (even a cold one) and feel cooler. The net effect of the evaporational cooling in this case, like in the storm that hit NYC in November, was to keep environmental temperatures below freezing for longer than expected (shifting the red environmental temperature line to the left on a Skew-T), allowing snow to fall and accumulate for a longer period as well.

The issue for forecasters here, and for NYC on November 15, was that the models were not all in agreement about how dry the low levels of the atmosphere would be at the outset of the storm. Forecasters are trained not to rely solely on just one model’s depiction of upcoming events, even though in this case, some models had what turned out to be a much more accurate take on dry air. As we’ve seen, the difference of a degree or two when temperatures in the atmosphere are close to the freezing line can have serious consequences for tangible weather impacts.

Frontogenesis and mesoscale (localized) banding

When coastal storms form off the East Coast during the winter, the temperature differential between the warmer air south of the storm’s core and the colder air to the north can lead to frontogenesis, which is the process of the formation of a frontal boundary. In these storms, the result is a coastal front. During this process, a mesoscale circulation forms as atmospheric dynamics attempt to restore equilibrium between cold and warm airmasses. This circulation can greatly enhance lift, a critical ingredient for heavy precipitation, as well as helping cool the air columns. For coastal storms during the winter, the result of strong frontogenesis is the development of narrow, but intense localized bands of heavy precipitation. The difference between an area impacted by a band like this can easily be more than 0.50″ of liquid equivalent, which if you convert to snow using a standard 10:1 snow-to-liquid ratio is 5″! The trouble with these mesoscale features, as is the case with thunderstorms, is that even the most advanced forecast models do not have sufficient resolution to accurately capture features on these scales. That means it’s often difficult to know for certain if/where/when one of these bands sets up and for how long – a critical, high impact detail that can make or break any forecast.

Analysis of frontogensis at 1PM on Sunday – the blue-green hues over Virginia indicate areas of strong frontogenesis

As it happened, with this storm, stronger frontogenesis than forecast took shape. The North American Model (NAM) actually had a pretty good handle on this, but as with the NYC storm, forecasters didn’t put all their eggs in one basket and side with this solution.

NAM’s forecast for frontogenesis valid at 3PM Sunday – the very tightly packed purple lines are an indication of intense frontogenesis

Cold air damming

Along the Eastern Seaboard, certain orientations of high pressure systems can lead to an effect known as cold air damming. This occurs when high pressure centers of Canadian origin set up northeast of the mid-Atlantic and Southeast. Anti-cyclonic clockwise flow around these highs brings cold air around the core of this high into the East Coast with easterly winds. At some point, these winds start to hit the eastern flank of the Appalachian mountains. Because cold air has higher density, the mountains provide an effective barrier to the westward (and upward) progress of this cold air. This then leads the air to gradually turn to the left (south) and progress further south than would otherwise be possible without the cold air damming effect. This is visible from the following surface analysis where you can see surface isobars linked to the high pressure center “sagging” south along the eastern edge of the Appalachians. This phenomenon can provide a critical shot of cold air in advance of a storm that can tip the balance from a rain event to a snow/mixed/frozen event. Forecasters probably did have a decent handle on this, but I mention it because it would have helped in keeping cold air in place prior to and during the beginning of the event.

11AM Sunday surface analysis from the Weather Prediction Center

What are some takeaways from this?

Given that this scenario has unfolded twice this season, a key takeaway for forecasters should be to have heightened awareness of snowfall totals exceeding model consensus when one or more of those models is indicating the possibility for both strong frontogenesis with a coastal storm like this and very dry air preceding such a storm. Ideally, forecasters and emergency managers should be in close communication about probabilities of exceeding forecast totals as soon as evidence and observations show a colder scenario unfolding. If possible, these details should be passed on to the general public by highlighting the uncertainty that exists and probabilities, even if they’re not high, of exceeding forecast totals dramatically. Municipalities should have a fallback plan for fast mobilization of personnel and equipment for snow removal in the event that a forecast bust of this magnitude starts to look more likely during the early onset of a storm when we can verify things like dew points, and observe trends of mesoscale bands on radar.

NYC Weather Update – Dec 10, 2018

This week features a continuation of the same general pattern we’ve experienced over the past week with below normal temperatures and no precipitation to speak of. Temperatures will remain cold through the majority of the work week until a pattern change this weekend brings a return of more seasonable (and even above average) temperatures along with the potential for a coastal storm that is expected to bring be all rain.

Rest of today – sunny and cold with high temperatures topping out around 40°F.Overnight lows quite chilly in the upper-20s to 30°F in the city. Clear skies and calm winds expected, giving rise to excellent conditions for radiational cooling.

Tuesday – very similar profile to today, another mostly sunny to sunny day with high temperatures in the upper-30s. More clouds expected overnight should help offset some radiational cooling, but still cold with lows around 30°F again.

500 mb longwave trough over the Eastern US, resulting in some colder than normal temperatures

Wednesday – broken record type of forecast here, yet another day of temperatures in the upper-30s. There’s more potential for cloud cover with this day due to the influence of a cold front which is forecast to move through. At this time, it doesn’t look like there’s enough moisture in the atmosphere for this to trigger snow showers. Cold again overnight with a reinforcing shot of Canadian air associated with a high pressure center behind this cold front. Lows in the mid-20s overnight.

Weather Prediction Center surface forecast for Wednesday morning, showing a cold front moving through our area

Thursday – partly sunny with high temperatures yet again hovering near 40°F. Overnight lows will be warmer in the mid-30s going into Friday than the rest of the week with return flow from the southwest behind the high pressure referenced above moving southeast into the Atlantic.

WxChallenge Caribou, ME (KCAR) Day 7 High Temperatures – Nov 4, 2018

What follows is a discussion lab that I wrote for this past week’s WxChallenge forecast competition as part of Penn State University World Campus’ METEO 410 capstone class in weather forecasting. I’m sharing this to give folks a glimpse into the forecasting process we’ve been learning, and because this discussion lab garnered some plaudits from my instructor for providing a really good analysis with attention to detail.

Model Guidance

12Z NAM MOS and 18Z GFS MOS (model output statistics) today agreed on a high temperature of 46°F for Day 7 (06Z Thursday to 06Z Friday). 00Z Wednesday’s NBM run was forecasting 44°F. 18Z EKDMOS shows ~46°F in the 50th percentile, with 50°F in the 90th percentile, and 41°F in the 10th percentile.

MOS forecasts October 31, 2018

National Blend of Models (NBM) – a consensus MOS product

EKDMOS (Ensemble Kernel Density MOS), producing a probabilistic forecast of severeal different variables. This shows maximum temperatures. The green bar shows the 10th percentile, red bar the 50th percentile, and blue bar the 90th percentile

Synoptic Set Up

By Thursday, the cold front of the occluded low that will bring precipitation Wednesday is forecast to have pushed through KCAR. During this frontal passage, winds will veer from the SSE towards the west. Winds are not forecast to be particularly strong, however, westerly winds would downslope a bit, enhancing wind speeds as well as warming temperatures a touch.

Weather Prediction Center (WPC) surface forecast for 00Z Friday November 2 (8PM Thursday, November 1, 2018)

Typically, we’d expect temperatures to be cooler behind a cold front due to cold air advection (CAA). Checking dynamical model forecast 2-meter temperatures, there’s not really evidence of large temperature gradients around KCAR. Even though winds will be blowing from areas of cooler temperatures towards warmer temperatures, the lack of a large gradient and low wind speeds do not suggest strong CAA.

It’s worth noting that the cold front appears to have anafrontal characteristics (precipitation behind the front seen in the WPC surface forecast) – this has implications on cloud cover behind the front. Both sets of MOS guidance show overcast conditions throughout the day. Forecast soundings suggest the main effect of the cold front is a drying out of the layer between approximately 900 mb to 600 mb initially, though by 18Z Thursday this layer dry layer tops out 700 mb (NAM has a smaller dry layer, between 900 mb and 750 mb – not pictured). Outside of this dry layer, clouds appear likely both near the surface and also from the top of the dry layer to as high as 200 mb (300 mb in NAM). In fact, it appears that the column above the dry layer will be saturated, and precipitation will be falling at upper levels during periods of the day, which explains why the dry layer shrinks from the top down as moisture works its way down through the column.

GFS forecast sounding

Closing Thoughts

Because of the likelihood of persistent, seemingly thick overcast during peak heating, I’m hesitant to side with the MOS consensus of 46°F, which I think is too warm. Even if precipitation doesn’t reach the ground, evaporational cooling may still be a factor. I think NBM’s 44°F is reasonable given the current data. I wouldn’t go too low into the low-40s because of warming impacts of downsloping westerly winds and the lack of any strong CAA.

Results

Subsequent MOS runs actually trended up, as high as 49°F. However, because of the factors outlined above, I continued to hedge down from MOS guidance, and submitted a finalized forecast of 46°F on the day. The actual high ended up being 45°F. Because I hedged down, I was able to minimize my error points for the day and ended up climbing to the top of the class leaderboard.

WxChallenge Philadelphia, PA Climatology – Nov 4, 2018

As part of the WxChallenge competition and Penn State University World Campus’ METEO 410 capstone course on weather forecasting, we are required to write up climatologies for cities that we will be forecasting for during the competition. I thought I would share the latest one I put together for Philadelphia, PA, which will be our forecast city for the next 2 weeks in the competition.

Climatology for Philadelphia, PA (KPHL)

City Name / Station ID: Philadelphia, PA (Philadelphia International Airport, KPHL)

Time Period: November 6-November 16

Topography and Geography

Local Time Zone: Eastern Standard Time (UTC -5)

Station Elevation: 10 feet above sea level.

Station Location: Philadelphia International Airport (KPHL) lies on the north bank of the Delaware River, 6.75 miles southwest of City Hall in downtown Philadelphia.

Important Topographical Features: Philadelphia is located in the southeasternmost corner of Pennsylvania, along the border with New Jersey to the east defined by the Delaware River. Philadelphia lies along the Fall Line, and there are rolling hills oriented southwest-northeast immediately west and north of the city. These hills have elevations of 200-500 feet. The Appalachian Mountains are further north and west, though many of these can be characterized more as narrow ridges. The elevations of these ridges range from 1000-1500 feet. East of the city are lowlands of the coastal plain in New Jersey. Although KPHL isn’t directly on the coastline, there are significant bodies of water within 55 miles of the site, including Chesapeake Bay to the southwest, Delaware Bay to the south, and the Atlantic Ocean to the southeast and east. Lastly, although not technically a topographical feature, the city of Philadelphia is a sizable urban agglomeration that can have effects on local microclimates via differential heating (urban heat island effect).

Winds

Wind Roses:

Frequency (percentage) of the single most common wind direction: West-northwest, occurring around 11.5% of the time.

Directions that are most and least common: Most common wind directions: southwest (~10.25%), west (~10%), northwest (~9.5%), west-southwest (~8.75%). Least common wind directions: southeast (2.5%), east-southeast (~2.75%), south-southeast (3%).

Direction(s) most likely to produce the fastest winds: west-northwest, and northwest have the highest likelihood of producing winds in excess of 21.5 knots. Due west is not far behind either.

Direction(s) least likely to produce the fastest winds: The least common wind directions (east-southeast, southeast, and south-southeast) also are least likely to produce winds exceeding 16.5 knots. Among these, southeast winds have the lowest frequency of producing winds in excess of 16.5 knots.

Impacts of wind direction on local weather: Winds from the westerly-northerly directions flowing towards KPHL would all experience some degree of downsloping (not particularly strong), as they flow over and down the higher terrain in these regions as discussed in the section on topography. Southwesterly-easterly winds all have the potential to transport moisture into the KPHL area, as they would flow over Chesapeake Bay (southwest), Delaware Bay (south), and the Atlantic Ocean (southeast-east). Southwest winds are quite common – the southerly-easterly winds are significantly less common, but still occur collectively about 17% of the time. The LCD mentions both the Appalachian Mountains and the Atlantic Ocean as moderating influences, as winds from the former warm via downsloping; and winds from the advect cooler marine air in the warm season, and milder air in the cold season.

While northeasterly are generally uncommon, east-northeast winds are somewhat more frequent, occurring about 6.5% of the time. Winds from these directions are noteworthy for a couple impacts. First, when KPHL lies north of a deepening coastal low, these winds can enhance moisture transport from the Atlantic Ocean while also possibly bringing milder air from the ocean when the sea surface temperatures exceed surface temperatures during winter. Second, when a high pressure center approaches KPHL from the west, these winds can bring result in cold air damming as they would eventually pool cooler air at the base of higher terrain west of KPHL before turning south. This scenario would bring about cooler temperatures than otherwise expected. Though less of a concern during the cold season, there could be scenarios in which a strong enough sea breeze could penetrate far enough inland during the warm season to suppress temperatures at KPHL. On the other hand, the urban heat island effect induced by the city of Philadelphia should have year-round impacts in terms of generating an inbound wind from outlying suburbs towards the city center (which KPHL is very close to), while also resulting in warmer temperatures than surrounding areas.

Maximum observed two-minute wind speed for the month (or months) in knots: 40 knots (converted from 46 mph)

Temperatures

Date Normal Maximum (ºF) Normal Minimum (ºF) Record Maximum (ºF) Record Minimum (ºF) Record Lowest Maximum (ºF) Record Highest Minimum (ºF)
Tuesday 11/06 60 42 79 26 36 66
Wed.

11/07

59 42 75 20 38 56
Thursday 11/08 59 41 78 25 42 61
Friday 11/09 59 41 78 23 40 60
Tuesday 11/13 57 40 72 24 38 57
Wed. 11/14 57 40 76 19 35 56
Thursday 11/15 56 39 81 19 38 61
Friday 11/16 56 39 76 22 38 55
RANGE 56-60 39-42 72-81 19-26 35-42 55-66

 

Precipitation

Date Normal (inches of liquid) Record Maximum (inches of liquid)
Tuesday 11/06 0.09 1.41
Wednesday 11/07 0.10 3.99
Thursday 11/08 0.09 3.07
Friday 11/09 0.09 0.86
Tuesday 11/13 0.09 1.56
Wednesday 11/14 0.09 2.64
Thursday 11/15 0.10 1.95
Friday 11/16 0.09 1.46
RANGE 0.09-0.10 0.86-3.99

 

NYC Weather Update – Weekend Nor’easter – Oct 26, 2018

I haven’t had time to post about the current week’s WxChallenge forecasts for Caribou, ME, which I’ll have a follow up post about Saturday or Sunday to go over my results. Instead, this week, I’m going to put the same forecast skills I’ve been applying to the upcoming nor’easter that’s going to impact NYC Saturday. I’ll provide a deterministic (exact number) forecast for high temperature, low temperature, maximum sustained wind speed, and total accumulated precipitation for the period starting 2AM Saturday and ending 2AM Sunday, with a less exact forecast for the rest of the weekend. In my later follow up post, I’ll verify my results and see just how close I got. For purposes of verification, my forecast will be for LGA. If you’re only reading this summary, just know that Saturday will be a windy, raw, rainy day, but that conditions will improve as the day goes on.

Friday – partly sunny skies with high temperatures in the low-50s. Light winds from the south-southeast.

Saturday – High temperature: 54°F. Low: 48°F. Maximum sustained winds (2-minute averaged): 34.5 mph from the east-northeast. Total precipitation: 1.25″. The bulk of the rain should end by the afternoon hours.

Sunday – mostly cloudy, high temperatures in the upper-50s with return flow from the west downsloping into the area.

Forecast Discussion

The nor’easter that’s coming to us this weekend has tropical origins as the remnants of Hurricane Willa, which originated in the Eastern Pacific and made landfall in Mexico as an intense Category 3 storm. This means that it will be able to tap to tropical moisture, bringing the potential for a heavy rainfall event. At the surface, a low pressure center will be intensifying as it slides up along the Mid-Atlantic coast. At the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere, the set up is favorable for robust divergence, which should result in to strong surface convergence and lift. At the 850 mb level, there are indications of a strong low-level jet with winds as high as 50 knots from the east to east-northeast during the Saturday morning hours ahead of the warm front attached to the nor’easter. This would enable highly efficient moisture transport and convergence in our area. The net result of this should be periods of heavy rain. This is what justifies rainfall totals over an inch, though because of the relatively fast forward speed of this storm, I don’t believe that totals above 1.50″ are likely.

These aren’t pictured below, but MOS (model output statistics), and forecast plumes (ensembles of many different iterations of the same forecast model) probabilities suggest a consensus range of 1.15″-1.24″. Short Range Ensemble Forecast (SREF) probabilities show a greater than 90% chance for rainfall totals greater than or equal to 0.50″, 70-90% chance of totals greater than or equal to 1.00″, but very low chances of totals exceed 2.00″. The record rainfall for Saturday at LGA is 1.76″, though there are higher record totals surrounding this date, so this record isn’t what we’d call particularly strong.

On the temperature front, the trajectory of the onshore flow accompanying this storm actually brings it over Atlantic waters that are warmer than the air temperatures have been this week. This should bring warmer air into the area, however, because it will also be raining and cloudy, evaporational cooling will be a concern (as it rains, some of the moisture from raindrops will evaporate, which takes heat input to achieve, lowering surrounding temperatures), and that will likely knock temperatures down a bit. Overnight lows should end up being fairly mild in comparison to previous nights because of cloud cover and the aforementioned winds over warmer waters.

The wind speeds should be quite strong tomorrow. MOS is showing winds in the 24-26 knot range. However, given that 850 mb winds will be even strong, in the 50 knot range, and it will be precipitating, meaning downward transfer of momentum by raindrops should mix some of these stronger winds to the surface, which is why I think sustained winds could be as high as 35 mph at some point in the day at LGA (which is exposed near open water, so there’s less of an impact from friction over the land). I think gusts could easily top 40-45 mph tomorrow during the most intense rain squalls.

Surface forecast from the Weather Prediction Center valid for 8AM Saturday, showing the nor’easter in question

850 mb forecast for relative humidity and wind valid 8AM Saturday. The dark blues show saturated air mass, and the wind barbs show strong onshore winds

500 mb vorticity and heights, the yellow-orange-purple shading shows progressively stronger values of positive vorticity. Without getting too technical, positive vorticity is related to divergence aloft, which helps aid upwards motion (lift). Strong upwards motion can lead to clouds and precipitation.

Shaded areas indicate strong winds at the 300 mb level. These are referred to as jet streaks. Our region is forecast to lie within the left exit region of a jet streak, an area that favors divergence and enhanced upwards motion/lift

Not surprisingly, the SREF probability forecast shows a 70-90% probability of omega (a quantitative measure of lift) exceeding -9 microbars/sec, which is considered quite strong

Update: Verification

According to the KLGA Daily Climatological Report showed the following for Saturday, October 27, 2018:

High Temperature: 53°F

Low Temperature: 45°F

Max Wind: 41 mph

Max Gust: 50 mph

Total QPF (this is taken from METAR data): 0.98″

I’ll attempt to do a post-mortem on the winds and QPF forecast where I missed pretty significantly later in the week.

WxChallenge for Omaha, Nebraska (KOMA) | Oct 16-19

Last Week’s Results

Tough week last week, with the major forecast bust I had on precipitation for Oct 9 for Omaha, plus generally underwhelming performances on temperatures the remainder of the week. Since I did pretty well the on the first city, and am better this week, my cumulative rank hasn’t gone down too much and I’m sitting at #263 nationwide (out of 1500) as of this writing.

Verifications

Below are the verified readings for each metric we were asked to forecast during last week, and a column showing error points I was assessed.

 

Forecast Day Max Temp (°F) Min Temp (°F) Max Sustained Wind (kts) Precipitation (inches) Error Points Assessed
10/09/2018 57 50 16 0.74 22.7
10/10/2018 50 40 23 0.01 7.9
10/11/2018 51 38 19 0.00 8.0
10/12/2018 47 39 10 0.12 5.3

Post-Mortem

Day 1: Major bust across the board. Was off by more 5 degrees or more on both the high and low. This made up about half of the error points. The rest came from being off on max precipitation by more than 1.20”. MOS was considerably off the mark with temperatures – though NAM was closer. This was all due to the fact that a stationary frontal boundary never made it close enough to KOMA to realize warmer temperatures, and heavier precip. The axis of the 850 mb LLJ stayed south and east, along with the best surface convergence. As a result, nearly all of the model guidance was horribly wrong. The closest forecast in the class was still nearly 0.50” too high. I put too much credence into the upwards trends on the models – there were some indications already that KOMA was trending to be on the drier side of this event. Still, even if I had nailed the precipitation forecast, I would have busted hard on the temperatures. Need to be a lot more cautious going forward about situations where a frontal boundary and precipitation are around, and probably hedge down on temperatures during transitional seasons when a forecast site could be on the cold side of a front with rain.

Days 2-4: Much better forecasting overall, especially in regards to precipitation. However, got a lot of error points for being too cold across the board with temperatures. Buying into the colder temperatures in MOS made for an overall forecast that was too cold.

Forecasting for Week 2 at KOMA (Omaha, NE) Oct 16-19

Synoptic Set Up

A much quieter weather week is in store for Omaha. With high pressure building, most of the forecast week will see sunny or clear conditions. Light synoptic flow suggests the possibility for winds decoupling at night, giving rise to highly favorable conditions for strong radiational cooling. Temperatures will be trending up through the week as a upper-level trough moves east and heights continue to build.

Notes

NAM MOS guidance seems to be the preferred alternative with respect to overnight lows, given that forecast soundings show a clear signal for nocturnal inversions. Our class discussion notes that 1.4” of snow fell at KOMA over the weekend. Temperatures are in the mid-40s today, but cold overnight lows may mean that we need to consider patchy snow cover in forecasting overnight lows. Since overnight lows are expected to be quite cold to start the week, daytime highs should also be below normal for this time of year. The NWS official forecast does show a warming trend in overnight lows through the week. Delta Method was suggested as a possible approach, and makes sense with how similar the air masses will be day to day. The trickiest part of the forecast this week will be how cold overnight with conditions conducive to strong radiational cooling, and just how much things can warm up during the day.

Forecasts Submitted

This only reflects finalized forecasts, I’ve made small adjustments to the forecast based on checking MOS daily.

Forecast Day Max Temp (°F) Min Temp (°F) Max Sustained Wind (kts) Precipitation (inches)
10/16/2018 60 33 13 0.00
10/17/2018 58 37 7 0.00
10/18/2018 64 43 15 0.00
10/19/2018 69 49 16 0.00

WxChallenge for Omaha, Nebraska (KOMA) | Oct 9-12

A couple days into the forecast period for the second WxChallenge city for this fall, and I’ve experienced my worst forecast bust (for yesterday). Highlights in the post-mortem section. It has been a week of transitions for Omaha, which started off with relatively mild conditions but will end the week with possibility for patchy frost!

Synoptic Set Up

A 500 mb longwave trough will with multiple attendant vorticity maxima will pivot through the KOMA region during the first half of the forecast period before flow becomes more zonal. At the 300 mb level, multiple jet streaks could boost divergence with these 500 mb vorticity maxima. This enhanced lift, and strong wind shear profile could lead to some isolated strong-severe thunderstorms. The 850 mb shows evidence of a decently robust LLJ that would should bring a continuous supply of Gulf moisture up the Missouri Valley into the area. At the surface, a warm front looks to lift through Monday, then stall as a cold front in the vicinity of KOMA through late Wednesday due to the deep unidirectional winds parallel to the front boundary.

Notes

The potential for flash flooding, and bouts of heavy rain, is duly noted in the AFD during the first half of the weak. The synoptic ingredients for a long duration rainfall event are certainly evident. Soils in the area are already quite moist, given that flood warnings were present for stretches of the Missouri last week. GFS MOS QPF range on Sunday for 06Z Tuesday to 06Z Wednesday was 1.75-4.46”. NAM MOS QPF range for this time was 1.35-2.71”, consensus was 1.55-3.59”. Records around this time of year for QPF show that 1-2” can easily occur, despite the normal being only a mere 0.07”. SREF probabilities of >= 0.50” were above 90% for this period, and >= 1.00” was 50-70%, but over 2.00” of QPF probabilities were less than 10%. SREF mean was 2.73”, with a pretty large spread, from 0.69-5.54”. GFS mean was 3.93” with spread of 1.82-5.16”. For now, going with a superblend of the low-end of the ranges of MOS and plumes: 1.40”.

As of Monday, SREF and GEFs means had become much better aligned, with SREF mean at 2.83” and GEFs mean 2.95”. SREF spread was 1.34-4.46”, GEFs was 1.43-4.43”. QPF forecast shows KOMA a pretty large QPF gradient, and that uncertainty seems borne out well in the ensemble forecasts. SREF probabilities of >= 2.00” increased to the 10-30% with KOMA lying right on the fringe of 30-50% probabilities of this amount. >= 1.00” probabilities increased to 70-90%. Official NWS forecast as of 10Z Monday called for 1.65” during the forecast period Tuesday. GFS MOS QPF range was 2.10-4.21”, NAM 1.01-2.06”, consensus here is 1.55-3.13”. Based on these updates, I’m increasing my forecast to 1.85” – I’m hedging down below the SREF and GEFS means because I’m still not sure where the stationary/slow-moving surface front will set up in relation to KOMA, and where the best lift will be for heavy rain/thunderstorms as a result. Also, if the 850 mb LLJ fails to materialize close to KOMA, we could be looking at lower overall totals. Low SREF probabilities of over 2.00” also help justify this call. Looking at Wednesday, rain chances diminish considerably after the front moves through, but the story then becomes strong winds possible, with MOS pointing at 17-20 knot synoptic winds.

Ensembles continue to trend upwards as of Monday afternoon with QPF, SREF mean now 2.96” and GEFS mean is 3.16”. SREF probabilities are close to placing KOMA in the 50% >= 2.00” QPF. Will take one more look at 18Z MOS guidance and some other factors before finalizing, but am leaning towards increasing the precip forecast again, this time to maybe 1.90” I’m wary of going for 3” of QPF or higher, given that the entire month’s single-day QPF record is 3.09”. Even beyond 2” still seems unlikely.

On Tuesday, looking ahead at Wednesday and Thursday, the passage of a cold front is quite evident. Temperatures are forecast to drop considerably compared with the beginning of the weak, and precipitation will end, too. The forecast for Wednesday still retains a slight chance for some measurable QPF on the tail end of the main precipitation event Tuesday. Models have backed down from up to 0.25” of precip to less than 0.10”. SREF and GEFS means show approximately 0.04” on Wednesday. SREF probabilities showed that KOMA had a greater than 90% chance of receiving precipitation >= 0.01”, but less than 10% of >= 0.10”, going to go straight up with the ensemble means here. The other story for Wednesday will be stiff winds from the northwest, with MOS synoptic winds of 17-18 knots. This suggests even stronger sustained winds, and will aid in cold advection, keeping high temperatures suppressed. These blustery conditions are forecast to gradually abate by late in the day Thursday, such that the strongest winds Thursday should occur early in the overnight hours. Cold temperatures overnight into Thursday should be somewhat tempered by decent vertical mixing and overcast skies.

Forecasts Submitted

This only reflects finalized forecasts, I’ve made small adjustments to the forecast based on checking MOS daily.

Forecast Day Max Temp (°F) Min Temp (°F) Max Sustained Wind (kts) Precipitation (inches)
10/09/2018 62 57 14 1.91
10/10/2018 48 44 20 0.02
10/11/2018 48 34 17 0.00
10/12/2018 48 35 9 0.10

Post-Mortem

Day 1: Major bust across the board. Was off by more 5 degrees or more on both the high and low. This made up about half of the error points. The rest came from being off on max precipitation by more than 1.20”. MOS was considerably off the mark with temperatures – though NAM was closer. This was all due to the fact that a stationary frontal boundary never made it close enough to KOMA to realize warmer temperatures, and heavier precip. The axis of the 850 mb LLJ stayed south and east, along with the best surface convergence. As a result, nearly all of the model guidance was horribly wrong. The closest forecast in the class was still nearly 0.50” too high. I put too much credence into the upwards trends on the models – there were some indications already that KOMA was trending to be on the drier side of this event. Still, even if I had nailed the precipitation forecast, I would have still busted hard on the temperatures. Need to be a lot more cautious going forward about situations where a frontal boundary and precipitation are around, and probably hedge down on temperatures during transitional season when a forecast site could be on the cold side of a front with rain.

WxChallenge for Portland International Airport (KPDX) | Oct 2-5

Last Week’s Results

After the first week of the WxChallenge (and part of this week), I’m second place in my class, tied with multiple others for #268 nationwide, and a little better than national consensus with 21.2 error points. I got hit the last day for going over on temperatures and winds, and will discuss that below. Hats off to one of my classmates who’s currently #44 nationwide!

Verifications

Below are the verified readings for each metric we were asked to forecast during last week, and a column showing error points I was assessed.

Forecast Day Max Temp (°F) Min Temp (°F) Max Sustained Wind (kts) Precipitation (inches) Error Points Assessed
09/25/2018 82 50 11 0.00 4.0
09/26/2018 83 52 11 0.00 1.0
09/27/2018 84 52 9 0.00 2.5
09/28/2018 86 53 11 0.00 6.5

Post-Mortem

Day 1: went too aggressive on the max winds, and too warm on the low temps. The lower winds could explain the lower min temps (less mixing on clear nights). I think I was too optimistic about the possibility of funneling of winds from the ENE along the Columbia River Gorge.

Day 2: did pretty well, only got 1 point off for missing the high temp slightly. If I had stayed with my original forecast for that I would have had a perfect score! Much better on winds though.

Day 3 & Day 4: another decent day, but went a little too cool with the low temperatures. This low bias also bled into Day 4, where I was low on both the high, low, and max sustained wind speeds. I think if I were to go back and redo this, maybe I would have used the Delta Method (a form of moderate persistence) and been better off than looking at MOS, given how stable conditions were throughout the week.

Forecasting for KPDX October 2-5, 2018

Synoptic Set Up

Big changes in store for Oregon in the second week of the forecast challenge. The rex block and high pressure that brought a week of above normal warmth and clear skies last week will finally break down. The upper low associated with it will move northeast towards KPDX over the weekend. Local NWS forecasters currently (as of Thursday) noted considerable spread in forecast guidance about phasing of northern stream energy and a second upper low by the beginning of this forecast period, as well as interaction with outflow from Hurricane Rosa. AFD mentions longwave troughing as well, and this is backed up by GFS progs.

Rainy start to the week at KPDX possible

Coastal low coming ashore on Friday at KPDX

 

Forecast Rationale

The effects of the synoptic set up favor much cooler and unsettled conditions compared to last week. A drop in 500 mb heights with upper lows and longwave trough should result in temperatures close to or slightly below climatological norms. The prospect of this troughing means that precipitation will be in the mix as well at the start of the week. More substantial rain chances are in store for KPDX to end the week. Along with the rain Friday, we can expect cooler temperatures and windy weather as rain cooled air helps mix down some momentum from the lower atmosphere.

Forecasts Submitted

This only reflects finalized forecasts as of this posting, I’ve made small adjustments to the forecast based on checking MOS daily.

Forecast Day Max Temp (°F) Min Temp (°F) Max Sustained Wind (kts) Precipitation (inches)
10/02/2018 68 54 11 0.05
10/03/2018 67 45 7 0.00
10/04/2018 66 46 7 0.00
10/05/2018 57 49 15 0.28