I’m at my college for reunion weekend, and offered to do a detailed forecast for one of the days I’m here. Saturday is shaping up to be a bit of a mixed bag. Temperatures should be summer-like in the mid to upper-80s, but the downside is a risk for possibly strong to severe thunderstorms especially in the early evening hours. These thunderstorm chances are far from being certain though, and there’s a chance we may miss out entirely on any precipitation. In other words, it’s another good day for a precipitation forecast bust!

My Forecast
High: 87°F | Low: 62°F | Max sustained winds: 21 mph | Total precipitation: 0.28″ – verification will come from METAR data for the period between 2AM Saturday and 2AM Sunday (06Z Saturday to 06Z Sunday) at LPR (Lorain County Regional Airport).

Verification
High: 90°F | Low: 61°F | Max sustained winds: 25 mph | Total precipitation: 0.00″ – on high temperatures, hedging up towards the higher end of guidance turned out to be a good idea. It’s yet more evidence that MOS guidance tends to be too cool for breezy warm sectors. If anything, I could have been a touch more aggressive on the high here. Did well on the low temperature, and from what I could see, did decently on max winds too. Like I’d mentioned in the forecast, the bust potential for precipitation on this day was significant. That ended up being the case – KLPR and Oberlin missed out on the heaviest rain and more serious convective activity, leading to barely a trace of measurable precipitation. In retrospect, I probably could have gone even drier with my forecast, but I would still have not felt comfortable going with zeros.

Synoptic Set Up
A stationary front eventually lifts through Ohio overnight as a warm front. We’ll spend the day in the warm sector of a surface low centered over central Ontario. At the 850 mb level, winds will not be strong enough to qualify as a low-level jet and relative humidity values likewise do not appear particularly high. At 500 mb, a robust shortwave trough is forecast to push through later in the day, bringing some decent vorticity and upper-level lift. Further up at the 300 mb level, there’s not much evidence of enhanced divergence and lift since we’ll be south of a 300 mb jet streak.

High Temperatures
GFS and NAM MOS and NBM all show Saturday to be a warm day. GFS is the warmest with 87ºF while NBM is coolest with 83ºF. EKDMOS (ensemble MOS) 50th percentile matches comes close to GFS MOS at 86ºF. Because forecast soundings show we’ll be in a well-mixed warm sector with decent though not ideal conditions for warm advection, I am tending towards thinking that a high of 87ºF is in fact possible. We could be even warmer if enough sun breaks out between possible earlier showers and rain later in the day.

Low Temperatures
NAM and GFS MOS are again in close agreement with 61ºF and 63ºF lows respectively. NBM is a touch cooler at 59ºF. Although both NAM and GFS show evidence of a nocturnal inversion forming, and calm winds at the surface, both models also show extensive cloudiness or even precipitation ongoing overnight. Because the boundary layer starts out with plenty of moisture, there shouldn’t be much in the way of evaporational cooling. Thus, clouds will actually serve to stave off any radiational cooling, which leads me to believe overnight lows will be on the warmer side of guidance. I’ll go with 62ºF here.

• 

• 

Max Sustained Winds
NAM, GFS MOS have maximum synoptic winds averaging about 16 knots. I see no clear reasons to go much higher than 18 knots for a max sustained wind tomorrow, unless we happen have a thunderstorm roll through with sustained winds that are much higher. EKDMOS’ 50th percentile lies right around this figure. Even with well-mixed boundary layer forecast to form tomorrow afternoon, winds above the surface up to 850 mb do not appear to be that strong, only around 20-25 knots. Layer mean wind analysis of the NAM sounding only showed winds of about 16 knots.

• 

• 

Total Precipitation
There’s a large spread between NAM and GFS on forecast totals tomorrow. This will be the trickiest part of the forecast because there’s clear signs that convective precipitation, with a couple rounds of possibly strong to severe thunderstorms could materialize. Any strong thunderstorm passing overhead could quickly dump a few tenths of an inch of rain. However, if we miss out on any significant thunderstorm action, we could see just a trace of rain instead. It’s still too early to tell the finer details of where storms will initiate at this point. Based on forecast soundings above, the best chance for thunderstorms to roll through would be during the late afternoon and early evening, maybe 5-8PM when moisture is best and instability is maximized from daytime heating. Strong, mostly unidirectional shear profiles with westerly winds increasing from 10 knots at the surface to 50 knots at 500 mb suggest the potential for damaging winds as the biggest severe weather threat.

• 

• 

Going against the potential for significant precipitation, neither GFS nor NAM really show strong signals of low-level jet support. Winds at the 850 mb level don’t look to be particularly strong, and moisture support isn’t looking great either. What’s more, while there’s mention in the local forecast office discussion of a right entrance region of an upper-level jet that would provide some dynamic lift, I’m not seeing that myself. They did also mention that a trough would pass through and provide a focus for some lift. This would be a necessary trigger since there’s no clear frontal boundaries that would provide the convergence and lift necessary to generate showers and thunderstorms. Given the hit or miss nature of thunderstorms, less than ideal conditions for heavy precipitation, and disagreement between GFS and NAM MOS at this time, I find it prudent to hedge down with a forecast for 0.28″ of total precipitation despite MOS guidance averages at 0.48″.