A couple days into the forecast period for the second WxChallenge city for this fall, and I’ve experienced my worst forecast bust (for yesterday). Highlights in the post-mortem section. It has been a week of transitions for Omaha, which started off with relatively mild conditions but will end the week with possibility for patchy frost!

Synoptic Set Up

A 500 mb longwave trough will with multiple attendant vorticity maxima will pivot through the KOMA region during the first half of the forecast period before flow becomes more zonal. At the 300 mb level, multiple jet streaks could boost divergence with these 500 mb vorticity maxima. This enhanced lift, and strong wind shear profile could lead to some isolated strong-severe thunderstorms. The 850 mb shows evidence of a decently robust LLJ that would should bring a continuous supply of Gulf moisture up the Missouri Valley into the area. At the surface, a warm front looks to lift through Monday, then stall as a cold front in the vicinity of KOMA through late Wednesday due to the deep unidirectional winds parallel to the front boundary.

Notes

The potential for flash flooding, and bouts of heavy rain, is duly noted in the AFD during the first half of the weak. The synoptic ingredients for a long duration rainfall event are certainly evident. Soils in the area are already quite moist, given that flood warnings were present for stretches of the Missouri last week. GFS MOS QPF range on Sunday for 06Z Tuesday to 06Z Wednesday was 1.75-4.46”. NAM MOS QPF range for this time was 1.35-2.71”, consensus was 1.55-3.59”. Records around this time of year for QPF show that 1-2” can easily occur, despite the normal being only a mere 0.07”. SREF probabilities of >= 0.50” were above 90% for this period, and >= 1.00” was 50-70%, but over 2.00” of QPF probabilities were less than 10%. SREF mean was 2.73”, with a pretty large spread, from 0.69-5.54”. GFS mean was 3.93” with spread of 1.82-5.16”. For now, going with a superblend of the low-end of the ranges of MOS and plumes: 1.40”.

As of Monday, SREF and GEFs means had become much better aligned, with SREF mean at 2.83” and GEFs mean 2.95”. SREF spread was 1.34-4.46”, GEFs was 1.43-4.43”. QPF forecast shows KOMA a pretty large QPF gradient, and that uncertainty seems borne out well in the ensemble forecasts. SREF probabilities of >= 2.00” increased to the 10-30% with KOMA lying right on the fringe of 30-50% probabilities of this amount. >= 1.00” probabilities increased to 70-90%. Official NWS forecast as of 10Z Monday called for 1.65” during the forecast period Tuesday. GFS MOS QPF range was 2.10-4.21”, NAM 1.01-2.06”, consensus here is 1.55-3.13”. Based on these updates, I’m increasing my forecast to 1.85” – I’m hedging down below the SREF and GEFS means because I’m still not sure where the stationary/slow-moving surface front will set up in relation to KOMA, and where the best lift will be for heavy rain/thunderstorms as a result. Also, if the 850 mb LLJ fails to materialize close to KOMA, we could be looking at lower overall totals. Low SREF probabilities of over 2.00” also help justify this call. Looking at Wednesday, rain chances diminish considerably after the front moves through, but the story then becomes strong winds possible, with MOS pointing at 17-20 knot synoptic winds.

Ensembles continue to trend upwards as of Monday afternoon with QPF, SREF mean now 2.96” and GEFS mean is 3.16”. SREF probabilities are close to placing KOMA in the 50% >= 2.00” QPF. Will take one more look at 18Z MOS guidance and some other factors before finalizing, but am leaning towards increasing the precip forecast again, this time to maybe 1.90” I’m wary of going for 3” of QPF or higher, given that the entire month’s single-day QPF record is 3.09”. Even beyond 2” still seems unlikely.

On Tuesday, looking ahead at Wednesday and Thursday, the passage of a cold front is quite evident. Temperatures are forecast to drop considerably compared with the beginning of the weak, and precipitation will end, too. The forecast for Wednesday still retains a slight chance for some measurable QPF on the tail end of the main precipitation event Tuesday. Models have backed down from up to 0.25” of precip to less than 0.10”. SREF and GEFS means show approximately 0.04” on Wednesday. SREF probabilities showed that KOMA had a greater than 90% chance of receiving precipitation >= 0.01”, but less than 10% of >= 0.10”, going to go straight up with the ensemble means here. The other story for Wednesday will be stiff winds from the northwest, with MOS synoptic winds of 17-18 knots. This suggests even stronger sustained winds, and will aid in cold advection, keeping high temperatures suppressed. These blustery conditions are forecast to gradually abate by late in the day Thursday, such that the strongest winds Thursday should occur early in the overnight hours. Cold temperatures overnight into Thursday should be somewhat tempered by decent vertical mixing and overcast skies.

Forecasts Submitted

This only reflects finalized forecasts, I’ve made small adjustments to the forecast based on checking MOS daily.

Post-Mortem

Day 1: Major bust across the board. Was off by more 5 degrees or more on both the high and low. This made up about half of the error points. The rest came from being off on max precipitation by more than 1.20”. MOS was considerably off the mark with temperatures – though NAM was closer. This was all due to the fact that a stationary frontal boundary never made it close enough to KOMA to realize warmer temperatures, and heavier precip. The axis of the 850 mb LLJ stayed south and east, along with the best surface convergence. As a result, nearly all of the model guidance was horribly wrong. The closest forecast in the class was still nearly 0.50” too high. I put too much credence into the upwards trends on the models – there were some indications already that KOMA was trending to be on the drier side of this event. Still, even if I had nailed the precipitation forecast, I would have still busted hard on the temperatures. Need to be a lot more cautious going forward about situations where a frontal boundary and precipitation are around, and probably hedge down on temperatures during transitional season when a forecast site could be on the cold side of a front with rain.