April 19, 2019 KLGA Forecast Post-Mortem

For reference, here’s the post that triggered the following forecast post-mortem analysis. To start, here’s my forecast and the verified totals.

My Forecast
High: 70°F | Low: 58°F | Max sustained winds: 30 mph | Total precipitation: 0.10″

Verification
High: 76°F | Low: 56°F | Max sustained winds: 24 mph | Total precipitation: 0.16″

Since I did decently at forecasting the low temperature and total precipitation, this analysis will focus primarily on why I missed the mark on the high temperature and maximum sustained winds.

How I Verify Forecasts
For an explanation of how I verify my own forecasts, see the methodology outlined in this prior post-mortem post

Post-Mortem Analysis
On this forecast, I ended up handling total precipitation and low temperatures but missed the mark on the high temperature badly and to some extent the max sustained winds. Let’s look at what happened here.

High Temperature
When I was putting together my forecast on the high temperature, the MOS output for both primary models (GFS and NAM) suggested the day would be largely overcast. Forecast soundings also suggested a deck of low clouds would be present for nearly the entirety of the day before the onset of an initial round of precipitation in the late evening/early overnight hours. Indeed, morning soundings at 8AM seemed to bear out what forecast models were calling for.

Sounding at 8AM from Brookhaven National Laboratory in Long Island, the site of the local National Weather Service forecast office for NYC. Note that the lower atmosphere, below 850 mb, is largely saturated, indicating low clouds and fog

Above the low level clouds, though, there was a noticeable dry layer up to about 500 mb, where high clouds were present. For temperatures, the biggest impact that’s hardest to pick up in advance is a low, thin, but optically thick layer of overcast clouds. Such a layer would suppress temperatures, whereas the lack of such a layer would allow for higher temperatures.

GOES East 1km resolution visible satellite image at 2:56 PM Friday, April 19. Note the relatively small pocket of clear skies right over NYC, western Long Island and Southwestern Connecticut.

In this event, where we were already in the warm sector of a low, any breaks in the clouds allowed for a dramatically warmer high temperature. As it turns out, there was a period of a couple hours in the afternoon during peak heating hours for this time of year that the skies were basically clear over NYC. In the spring, as the angle of the sun’s rays becomes ever more direct, even a small span of time like this with clear skies can result in significantly warmer temperatures. The small geographic scale of this pocket of clear skies, which was largely surrounded by cloudy conditions, shows you how difficult it is to predict something on a small scale like this, even just a day before the event itself!

Max Sustained Winds
On max sustained winds, I was off by 6 mph. That’s not too bad in the grand scheme of things. However, looking back at it, I should have realized that my own forecast calling for a small potential for precipitation would likewise mean a lower possibility for strong winds mixing down from 850 mb to the surface.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *