Last Sunday, while I was preparing my post on the snowstorm that was about to hit NYC and the Northeast, the southern side of this same storm system was starting to produce a serious severe weather event in portions of the Deep South. A large, violent, and ultimately deadly EF4 tornado hit parts of Lee County, AL during the afternoon. The tragic toll of 23 confirmed fatalities due to this tornado was more than double the total deaths due to tornadoes in all of 2018. This was also the deadliest single tornado since the EF5 tornado that hit Moore, OK on May 20, 2013. In this post, I’ll share some thoughts and observations about the meteorology behind this event, and about what made this tornado so powerful.
Storm Prediction Center’s Forecasts
One aspect of the event that impressed me was the prescient, geographically accurate, and timely Mesoscale Discussions and convective outlooks that the Storm Prediction Center issued during the course of the day. The SPC already had a handle on the risk for severe weather in parts of the Deep South as evidenced by the convective outlooks they issued Sunday morning.
Storm Prediction Center’s Day 1 Convective Outlook issued at 7:52AM Sunday Mar 3, 2019. The black dot within the orange “ENH” enhanced risk area shows the approximate location of Lee County, AL 
Storm Prediction Center similarly recognized the risk for tornadoes on this day. The black dot indicates the location of Lee County, AL. within the hatched yellow area representing a 10% or greater probability of EF2 – EF5 tornadoes within 25 miles of a point risk area
Regarding the enhanced risk area that the SPC identified as possibly being affected by tornadoes:
The most favorable … space for tornadic potential … still appears to be within the enhanced-risk area, where strong deep shear, large low-level hodographs, and at least low-end surface-based buoyancy will juxtapose. Forecast soundings show rapid prefrontal destabilization …. [a]s that occurs, severe potential will steadily ramp up…. a few tornadoes also are possible. Tornado-event density, and risk of significant tornadoes, still is somewhat unclear — being strongly dependent on existence/number of preceding supercells that can develop…
Storm prediction center, day 1 convective outlook issued 7:52AM EDT Mar 3, 2019
SPC foresaw that the energy (instability) and spin (shear, imparted by strong winds at different levels of the atmosphere) required for strong tornadoes would have a chance to come together in the enhanced risk area. They also identified that the greatest risk would be with any supercells that could form ahead of the main line of thunderstorms that would accompany the cold front later on.
As it turned out, supercells did form ahead of the cold front – one in particular drew the attention of astute SPC forecasters, and this would end up being the supercell responsible for the tornado that hit Lee County. In follow up Mesoscale Discussions regarding the tornado watches over the enhanced risk area, SPC forecasters were remarkably accurate and timely in identifying the risks associated with this supercell and the favorable conditions it would encounter.
MCD #0145 was issued at 1PM CDT (local time), and contained the following text. The forecasters cited favorable conditions for a strong tornado to form within 30-60 minutes. Just around 2PM, about 60 minutes after this MCD was issued, the EF4 tornado hit Lee County.
A mature supercell located near Montgomery is favorably located within a region of maximized surface pressure falls (3-4mb per 2 hours) immediately east/southeast of the surface low. KMXX VAD shows 500 m2/s2 0-1km SRH when accounting for the observed Montgomery County supercell’s storm motion. Given the ample buoyancy and intense shear profile in place, it appears tornadogenesis will likely occur within the next 30-60 minutes with the possibility of a strong tornado occurring.
Storm prediction center Mesoscale discussion #0145, issued 1PM CDT mar 3, 2019
Why Conditions Were So Favorable for a Strong Tornado
The following analysis about the mesoscale conditions that favored strong tornadoes on this day came about from a discussion I had with Steve Corfidi, my instructor for the class I took on mesoscale forecasting (severe weather forecasting) as part of Penn State’s Undergraduate Certificate in Weather Forecasting. Steve Corfidi also used to be the Lead Forecaster at the SPC. Suffice to say, I am quite privileged to have been able to glean some insights about this storm from him. These observations are related to another MCD from SPC that day, MCD #0147.
In this MCD, the SPC highlights an area of localized surface pressure falls in dashed blue. Steve Corfidi commented this effect is related to “rise and fall pressure “waves” that move across the earth twice-daily in response to solar heating”. As the earth heats up, air warms and rises, and this generates a thermal low since there’s less air over a warmed up spot of the earth than surrounding areas. In this case, this resulted in a localized area of surface pressure falls over the area circled in dashed blue as the day progressed. In response, surface winds will have a tendency to deflect towards the center of the lowering pressure. You can see this by looking at the wind barbs in the chart above: those that are closer to the cold front are more southwesterly, but the ones closer to the blue dashed area are actually more southerly, since they are deflecting towards the north and the localized pressure falls. This is known as the isallobaric effect. This had direct impacts on the favorability of the environment for tornadoes, as Steve Corfidi helped me understand.
As winds near the localized pressure falls became more southerly in response to isallobaric effect, this actually increased the vertical wind shear values in the area of the pressure falls (green here, blue dashed area in the SPC analysis, the red 300 mb wind profile barbs are approximated from this sounding). Since vertical wind shear is measured by looking at both the difference in direction and speed of winds at different levels, a change in wind direction at the surface, all else being equal, will result in higher wind shear. Relative to other areas in the warm sector of this storm, this produced an even higher value of storm relative helicity (SRH, as alluded to in MCD #0145) as well as the aforementioned vertical wind shear. I don’t have space to elaborate on why SRH and vertical wind shear are important for tornadoes, I will say that it has to do with enhancing storm rotation, and tornadoes are intense, vertical circulations of rotating air.
One other observation worth mentioning is that the “geometry” of the warm sector maximized the amount of time the supercell could spend in an extremely favorable environment. If you look at the large blue arrow in my illustrated diagram, check out how the approximate mean storm motion was largely parallel to the orientation of the warm front and axis of the maximized surface pressure falls. That meant that as the tornado formed, it was able to keep moving through a favorable environment for much longer than if the storm motion had been more northeasterly, or say southeasterly.