Tag Archives: mesoscale banding

NYC Snowfall Forecast – Mar 3, 2019

A winter storm warning is in effect for NYC and the surrounding metropolitan region. This isn’t exactly how we’d all want to start March off! This storm is anticipated to bring some travel impacts to the area, however, for reasons discussed below, this won’t be a blockbuster snowmaker. Watch out for a slog of a morning commute tomorrow. This snow may also stick for a while – a frigid continental polar air mass from Canada will sweep in behind this storm bringing temperatures generally 10-15°F below normal for this time of year. High temperatures in the mid-30s should limit melting.

Headlines

Snowfall totals: I’m forecasting 4-6″ in parts of eastern Queens, southeastern Brooklyn, and lower totals further east into Long Island. Higher totals of 6-8″ are more likely to occur in Manhattan, the Bronx, and points further inland, particularly interior regions of Connecticut. Below are probabilistic forecast maps of various amounts of snow (>= 2″, >= 6″, and >= 8″).

Timing: Precipitation starting in earnest around 8PM. Starting out as a mix of rain/snow near the coast, but transitioning over to all snow later in the evening. The heaviest snow will happen overnight. Because of the fast-moving nature of this storm, precipitation is expected to end rather quickly between 4-6AM Monday morning in the city.

Uncertainties: There is still potential for a wobble in the storm track, further east and south would result in higher snow totals near the coast. Further west and closer to the coast would mean more mixing/rain at the coast and lower snow totals. There will be a rather sharp gradient of increasing snowfall totals spreading across the region (as seen in the previous probabilistic snowfall total forecasts). Mesoscale heavy snow bands will be difficult to pinpoint ahead of time. Some areas could see several inches more than neighboring areas just a few miles south and east.

Synoptic Set Up (The Big Picture)

A storm that’s currently unleashing severe storms with tornadoes across the Deep South now will slide up along the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern coast of the US. As this storm progresses, it will move close to the 40°N/70°W benchmark, a spot that’s climatologically correlated to heavy snow events along the heavily populated I-95 corridor during the winter. This storm will continue to strengthen as it moves offshore. Snow is expected to develop ahead of the advancing warm front associated with this storm as its precipitation shield advances. Heavier snow is forecast to develop later on as strong isentropic lift associated with the warm front occurs, creating the potential for frontogenesis and some mesoscale bands of very heavy snow. The storm is expected to move quickly along the Northeast coast, such that the duration of precipitation in any one spot is expected to be less than 12 hours.

At the 500 mb level, a shortwave trough will provide positive vorticity and some additional lift/divergence, allowing the storm to continue strengthening. Finally, at the 300 mb level, the surface low will be close to the entrance region of a curved 300 mb jet streak. This will provide yet more divergence and lift, if only for a brief period.

Evolution of the Storm Track

Over the course of the last three days, forecast models have come into better agreement with this storm tracking close to the 40°N/70°W benchmark (circled in red in the images below). Note the increasingly tight clustering of storm center locations around the benchmark in progressive storm track forecasts from the Weather Prediction Center.

The tightening clustering of these forecast storm center locations lends greater confidence to the idea that the storm will track very close to the benchmark.

Ensemble Snowfall Totals

The two primary model ensembles (GEFS and SREF) have been edging ever so slightly upwards in their forecast mean snowfall totals, while the model spread has decreased over the weekend

These means/spreads were part of what informed my own forecast snowfall totals at the top of this post.

Factors Supporting Heavy Snow

  • Storm track over or very near the benchmark
  • Strong isentropic lift and possible frontogenesis (see images below). Strong lift is a critical ingredient for generating heavy precipitation
  • Possibility of mesoscale bands as a result of this lift, generating heavy snowfall rates
  • Temperatures probably supporting frozen precipitation through the atmosphere

Factors Suggesting Lower Snow Totals

  • Possibility still remains for storm track to shift further inland, introducing more warm air off the ocean, more rain than snow at the coast
  • Warm advection associated with the storm’s warm front possibly also affecting snow development. Note how close the overlapping temperature and dew point profiles in the forecast soundings above are to the freezing mark, the dashed blue line the middle of the image that is angled to the right at 45°. Evaporational cooling should help somewhat in staving off warming but if temperatures warm more than forecast, we could see more mixing
  • Mesoscale bands of heavy snow may not push far enough onshore
  • Surface temperatures ahead of the storm in the upper-30s near the coast, urban heat island effect could retard snow accumulation
  • Fast moving nature of the storm, total precipitation window only 12 hours
  • Small window for the best moisture support at the 850 mb level. No real evidence to suggest a low-level jet carrying a ton of moisture into the region.
NAM model forecast of 850 mb relative humidity and winds. There’s not too big of an area of completely saturated air at this level, and winds are not strong at this level either.

NYC Weather – After the Blizzard – Jan 27, 2015

As many of you woke up this morning, you were probably wondering, what happened here? This storm seemed like a dud. True, the snowfall totals in and around NYC were lower than initially forecast, but portions of the area did get slammed with over 20″ of snow. To put it simply – as I had laid out in the caveats from the last post, slight changes in track of this storm dramatically altered the placement of mesoscale banding features, hence leading to a sharp cutoff in snowfall totals from east to west.

Snowfall Totals

Looking at this snowfall totals map, you can easily make out the line that demarcates where the heaviest snow bands stopped their westward march. We got what appears to be around 6-8″ in the city, but just east of us in Nassau the totals jump to 12″ and then just east of that in Suffolk we see 20″+ totals.

Snowfall total map
Snowfall total map

On a larger scale, you can see the areas that got the highest snowfall totals, corresponding to where the heaviest bands of snow were able to pass over.

Screen Shot 2015-01-27 at 12.48.04 PM

Forecasters are saying that the storm tracked further east than they expected by about 50-75 miles, which literally would have meant the difference from us having 6-8″ snowfall totals here in the city to easily 12-18″+. Now before we all go blaming them for a dud forecast (that some are already saying wasted taxpayer money), there are a couple things to consider:

  1. Forecasters utilize a suite of different computer models to come up with these forecasts, in this case they favored the NAM (North American Mesoscale) and ECMWF (European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts) over the GFS (Global Forecast System), UKMET (United Kingdom Meteorology), and Canadian models. There were specific reasons for doing so, one of which is based on forecasters’ experience with these types of systems and which models have historically done a better job with them. ECMWF often does a very good job of modeling strong cyclonic systems like this (and is often favored in forecasting tropical cyclones). In this case, the NAM and ECMWF had the storm moving just far west enough to put us on the cusp of those high snowfall totals.
  2. Mesoscale (medium scale) banding features are notoriously difficult to forecast in these types of storms. The exact position, orientation, and movement of these banding features is often not known until the storm is already ongoing. This is due to a number of complex atmospheric interactions that are responsible for these features forming. To take another example, the Storm Prediction Center can forecast that severe thunderstorms are likely over a certain area 2-3 days out. However, it is exceedingly difficult even the day of to know which towns will get hit by individual storm cells/tornadoes, etc. Despite advances in supercomputing power, forecast skill and accuracy, and understanding of meteorology, these mesoscale events remain challenging to get right even for the most experienced forecaster. So while the general public can say, “I told you so”, I’d challenge any one of them to forecast the next Nor’easter, and the one after that, and so on, and get them right with more skill than a straight up guess.

Anyway, since we all got the day off (the political response to this storm is a whole other debate beyond the scope of this blog), forget about the forecast being a dud and go out to take advantage of a day off!

NYC Weather Bulletin – Jan 25, 2014 – Major Snowstorm Mon-Tue

Yesterday’s Nor’easter will seem downright quaint by the time Tuesday morning rolls around. Just a couple of days ago, forecasters were not even clear if we’d get any precipitation Monday going into Tuesday. Now, words like “historic” are being used to describe what will undoubtedly be the biggest snowstorm of the season so far. When all is said and done, we could be looking at widespread snow totals on Tuesday of 18″ to as much as two feet of snow. During the peak of this much stronger Nor’easter, high winds and blowing snow could lead to an extended period of blizzard conditions near the coast.

The Setup

Forecast models that up to just 2 days ago were displaying significant differences as to how this system would transpire are now in close agreement on a classic setup for a strong Nor’easter, and a powerful, high-impact blizzard for the Northeast.

A relatively weak clipper-type low will be moving across the Midwest during the day today. By Monday evening, a secondary low will form from the remnants of this first system. This second low will rapidly intensify as it tracks on or just west of the 40ºN 70ºW benchmark early Tuesday morning.

NAM model output for the next couple of days
NAM model output for the next couple of days

lowtrack_ensembles

As the low bombs out (dropping more 30mb in less than a day), its forward progress will be slowed by a high pressure to the north. This high pressure over Quebec is a key difference between the setup of the storm on Saturday and this coming Nor’easter. In contrast to Saturday’s storm, this high pressure will allow a relatively deep layer of cold air to take hold prior to the arrival of this storm. As the low pressure continues moving northeast, the pressure gradient between the rapidly intensifying low and this high pressure will allow for strong winds to affect the area from first from the east, then northeast and finally north.

gfs_namer_042_1000_850_thickThis combination of a slow moving, strong low pressure with ample cold air and moisture available will translate to widespread snowfall totals of over a foot, and close to 2 feet, primarily for the Hudson Valley and points east. This will primarily be due to the influence of a mesoscale deformation banding feature is expected to form north of the storm center, then slowly wrap around the storm as it moves northeast. Because the forward motion of the storm will be so slow, the banding feature (which could contain snowfall rates of 2-4″ per hour) could be sitting nearly stationary over large portions of the region for a prolonged period of time – thus leading to what could be record breaking totals.

With the wind expected to pick up during this event, there is a blizzard watch in effect for coastal areas of the region, where wind sustained winds (25-35mph) could lead to near zero visibilities while heavy snow falls.

Snowfall Totals

As you can see from below, almost the entire region is expected to pick up more than 12″, with eastern areas possibly picking up near 2 feet!

StormTotalSnowFcst

Looking at probabilities of snowfall totals below, you can see that there’s now at least a 70-80% chance a good portion of the NYC region receiving more than 8″ of snow.

Screen Shot 2015-01-25 at 1.38.03 PM

This storm will also have ample moisture to draw off of, with the liquid water equivalent of between 1.5″ to over 2″ across a good part of the region. Using the standard 10-1 ratio of snow to liquid water, this would translate to between 15-20″.

Quantitative precipitation total forecasts from the Weather Prediction Center
Quantitative precipitation total forecasts from the Weather Prediction Center

Timing

Snow will begin Monday, with increasing intensity through the day. Winds  from the northeast will also pick up during the day Monday with high temperatures only in the mid-upper 20s. Anywhere between 1-3″ of snow could fall across NYC.

The heaviest snow will be taking place overnight Monday into Tuesday morning, where parts of the area could pick up another 9-13″. Again, the heaviest snow will be occurring within the mesoscale banding feature, where intense snowfall rates of 2-4″ an hour for a prolonged period of time could even be accompanied by thundersnow. Winds will probably peak during this overnight period.

Snow will continue to fall during the day Tuesday, with another 4-8″ of snow possible. High temperatures will again only be in the upper 20s.

Rest of the Week

Wednesday – snow finally ends Tuesday night with conditions clearing by Wednesday, but high temperatures again struggling to reach the upper 20s.

Thursday – a slightly warmer day with high temperatures in the low 30s.

Friday – there’s a chance at some more precipitation (but much lighter) from a weak low pressure system moving through Friday.